<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Life &#8211; Day 3.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/the-life-day-31/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/the-life-day-31/</link>
	<description>design. business. mac love.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:47:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: luis</title>
		<link>http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/the-life-day-31/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 03:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happyapps.com/blog/?p=61#comment-274</guid>
		<description>sg - That makes sense.  I see that naming pattern working for apps like NetNewsWire and NetNewsWire Lite.

Interesting that there doesn&#039;t seem to be any Foo Lite, Foo, and Foo Pro combinations out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sg &#8211; That makes sense.  I see that naming pattern working for apps like NetNewsWire and NetNewsWire Lite.</p>
<p>Interesting that there doesn&#8217;t seem to be any Foo Lite, Foo, and Foo Pro combinations out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sg</title>
		<link>http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/the-life-day-31/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>sg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happyapps.com/blog/?p=61#comment-264</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d go for WebnoteHappy, without the Pro. It&#039;s more like the way it&#039;s usually done: a shareware &quot;name&quot; and a freeware &quot;name lite&quot; with only a subset of the features. The &quot;Pro&quot; implies there already exists a shareware without the &quot;Pro&quot; with less advanced features (think of OmniGraffle and OmniOutliner).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d go for WebnoteHappy, without the Pro. It&#8217;s more like the way it&#8217;s usually done: a shareware &#8220;name&#8221; and a freeware &#8220;name lite&#8221; with only a subset of the features. The &#8220;Pro&#8221; implies there already exists a shareware without the &#8220;Pro&#8221; with less advanced features (think of OmniGraffle and OmniOutliner).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

