Comments on: Intel iMac Core Duo (and other Macs) Subversion benchmark numbers http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/ design. business. mac love. Sun, 06 Jul 2008 02:23:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: vipera http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-74719 vipera Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:37:31 +0000 http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-74719 Xeon X3350 overclocked to 3ghz running CentOS 5.1 real 0m28.971s user 1m21.339s sys 0m14.435s Xeon X3350 overclocked to 3ghz running CentOS 5.1

real 0m28.971s
user 1m21.339s
sys 0m14.435s

]]> By: luis http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-24208 luis Sat, 14 Apr 2007 07:28:13 +0000 http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-24208 Gus - that rocks! I think you should try with make -j16 though and see if you can get those cores working harder. (Unless -j8 already pegged them to 100%) Jon - keep your powder dry until at least October then! Gus - that rocks! I think you should try with make -j16 though and see if you can get those cores working harder. (Unless -j8 already pegged them to 100%)

Jon - keep your powder dry until at least October then!

]]> By: Jonathan Wight http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-24080 Jonathan Wight Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:15:11 +0000 http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-24080 That's a beautiful, beautiful thing. I dont think my accounts department will let be buy another Mac this year. She's already upset about the 3 I bought last year, That’s a beautiful, beautiful thing.

I dont think my accounts department will let be buy another Mac this year. She’s already upset about the 3 I bought last year,

]]> By: Gus Mueller http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-23974 Gus Mueller Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:07:48 +0000 http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-23974 new 3ghz octomac, with svn 1.4.3 since 1.3 isn't compiling for some reason: time make -j8: real 0m40.151s user 1m35.757s sys 2m19.848s new 3ghz octomac, with svn 1.4.3 since 1.3 isn’t compiling for some reason:

time make -j8:
real 0m40.151s
user 1m35.757s
sys 2m19.848s

]]> By: Martin Pilkington http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-22075 Martin Pilkington Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:07:32 +0000 http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-22075 On a 1.83GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook with 512MB RAM: real 2m11.341s user 2m30.473s sys 1m 22.226s This is after a reboot on 10.4.9 On a 1.83GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook with 512MB RAM:

real 2m11.341s
user 2m30.473s
sys 1m 22.226s

This is after a reboot on 10.4.9

]]> By: 20″ Intel iMac Core 2 Duo svnmark score - Happy Apps http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-6777 20″ Intel iMac Core 2 Duo svnmark score - Happy Apps Mon, 27 Nov 2006 07:49:27 +0000 http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-6777 [...] I got a new 20″ Intel iMac last week. It’s a 2.16Ghz Core 2 Duo and its crazy fast compared to my old PowerBook G4 1.33Ghz. As you may know if you’re a loyal reader of this blog that I like svnmark (compiling subversion) because it is a benchmark that directly shows how much productivity gains you might be able to get if you upgraded your Mac. I mean its nice to see how many frames per second you might get in World of Warcraft, but really - you want to see if more cores / more gigahertz gives you faster compiles. [...] […] I got a new 20″ Intel iMac last week. It’s a 2.16Ghz Core 2 Duo and its crazy fast compared to my old PowerBook G4 1.33Ghz. As you may know if you’re a loyal reader of this blog that I like svnmark (compiling subversion) because it is a benchmark that directly shows how much productivity gains you might be able to get if you upgraded your Mac. I mean its nice to see how many frames per second you might get in World of Warcraft, but really - you want to see if more cores / more gigahertz gives you faster compiles. […]

]]> By: Jonathan Wight http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-3344 Jonathan Wight Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:27:52 +0000 http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-3344 Running Ubuntu linux 6.0.6 inside Parallels 1884 Release Candidate. VM was allocated 256MB and a 8GB expanding disk image. Host machine 2Ghz Black Macbook with 2GB of RAM real 6m46.800s user 2m0.688s sys 3m41.366s Uninspiring. 256MB of RAM probably had a lot to do with it. Running Ubuntu linux 6.0.6 inside Parallels 1884 Release Candidate.

VM was allocated 256MB and a 8GB expanding disk image.

Host machine 2Ghz Black Macbook with 2GB of RAM

real 6m46.800s
user 2m0.688s
sys 3m41.366s

Uninspiring. 256MB of RAM probably had a lot to do with it.

]]> By: Jonathan Wight http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-3297 Jonathan Wight Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:17:43 +0000 http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-3297 Looks like the 34 second build was a freak. I did about 4 reboots and builds using j8 and it was consistently 1m02 Using j4 (just to sanity check) was again a couple of seconds quicker. Looks like the 34 second build was a freak.

I did about 4 reboots and builds using j8 and it was consistently 1m02
Using j4 (just to sanity check) was again a couple of seconds quicker.

]]> By: Jonathan Wight http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-3293 Jonathan Wight Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:43:21 +0000 http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-3293 Holy crap... After a reboot using -j8 i get: real 0m34.485s user 0m15.372s sys 0m57.694s Will test this a couple more times to see if it is accurate. Holy crap…

After a reboot using -j8 i get:

real 0m34.485s
user 0m15.372s
sys 0m57.694s

Will test this a couple more times to see if it is accurate.

]]> By: Jonathan Wight http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-3292 Jonathan Wight Fri, 08 Sep 2006 17:40:36 +0000 http://www.happyapps.com/blog/2006/02/intel-imac-subversion-benchmark-numbers/#comment-3292 Same machine after a reboot and using -j4 real 0m58.967s user 1m45.444s sys 1m15.187s Same machine after a reboot and using -j4

real 0m58.967s
user 1m45.444s
sys 1m15.187s

]]>